NEW YORK ( TheStreet) -- Investors ready to break out the champagne for New Year's Eve might not want to hear it about these kind of bubbles. After enduring the dot.com bubble, the housing bubble and the credit bubble, here are five potential bubbles to beware in 2010.
Zombies Mowed Down
If you believe that "zombie" stocks like
will rise from the dead again in 2010, then perhaps you should be the one hunting for some brains.
It's true that
are still publicly traded and are not wholly-owned entities of the U.S. government. And 2009 was a banner year for investors in both companies, as Fannie Mae shares jumped nearly 70% in 2009 and almost 250% since the March low, and Freddie Mac rallied 118% for the year and more than 280% since the lows on March 6.
But for all intents and purposes, shares of Fannie and Freddie should be considered essentially worthless, no matter how enticing the penny stocks appear to be. Don't take my word for it, though. In August, even as Fannie and Freddie were surging to 52-week highs, FBR Capital Markets protested that "no underlying value remains" in the shares.
That didn't stop traders from driving the share price of both
higher in the dwindling days of 2009 after the Treasury Department removed the $400 billion financial cap on the money it will provide to both Fannie and Freddie.
It was this sort of speculative trading that drove these stocks higher in 2009, with traders ignoring the likely scenario where these zombies will continue to be private in name only and largely controlled by the U.S. government through 2010 and beyond. After all, the government owns roughly 80% of each company, with Fannie and Freddie owing a combined $111 billion. Apparently, it's also easy to forget the rumors circulating not long ago that both Fannie and Freddie, now in conservatorship, would be nationalized.
Lost in the end-of-year headlines is a Dec. 24 regulatory filing that showed top executives at
Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
will each earn between $4 million and $6 million in 2009. Bose George, an analyst with Keefe, Bruyette & Woods who downgraded both stocks to underperform and cut the price targets to zero in October, says it is a very telling sign that both CEOs were not given stock as part of their compensation.
The obvious reason, George wrote in a research note, is that "the shares have no long term value and that no executive would accept unvested shares of the companies as part of their compensation package. This reinforces our view that the common shares will eventually trade to zero."
For those still daring enough to ride the zombie wave higher into 2010: I'd like to introduce you to some
-- Written by Robert Holmes in Boston