Why should banks and insurers get all the free money?
Cerberus paid $7.4 billion to acquire most of Chrysler. Let's consider that a bridge loan, not unlike the
(AIG - Get Report)
received in September.
Why can't the U.S. government step in and help the automakers this time -- with a tidy profit for Cerberus, of course?
We're only talking about a small percentage of the $700 billion bank bailout money. Somewhere between $20 billion and $25 billion should be enough to cover the $12 billion
(GM - Get Report)
wants to finance a merger with Chrysler, plus a little something for
(F - Get Report)
to keep it fair and a few billion to help the unions get over their objections to all the job cuts that will be coming.
doesn't seem inclined to include the carmakers in the banking bailout.
No matter. There's talk of providing relief through the
. To get that money, the companies may need to give some lip service to producing more fuel-efficient vehicles.
Some free-market capitalists may object to the government telling automakers what kinds of cars to make. But let's face it: GM, Ford and Chrysler haven't been doing such a hot job of deciding that themselves, anyway.
So let's just cut some checks already. The way things are going, U.S. automakers won't be making
cars if they don't get help.