PBP has pretty much behaved as hoped for. It's up a little, while the S&P 500 has gone down a little. DNH is meant to be a substitute for iShares MSCI EAFE Fund(EFA Quote), and although DNH has done about the same as EFA since the portfolio's inception, I still think DNH is the better hold because it has zero exposure to Japan compared to almost 20% for EFA. Also, DNH's very heavy (87%) exposure to Australia provides for a better zig zag effect with its 0.678 correlation to the S&P 500 vs. 0.825 for EFA.
The idea behind IGF is that no matter what is going on with the stock-market cycle, money must be spent on infrastructure. The flow of capital creates a tailwind that could allow for price appreciation even in a down market. While IGF has done better than the S&P 500, it has not done much better -- it's down a little. JJA has delivered, not only with a 16% return, but also with a 0.02 correlation (according to PortfolioScience.com). (The chart looks like a negative correlation to me.)![]() |
| Click here for larger image. |
- Loading Comments...
- Loading Comments...
Featured Photo Galleries
| Dow Jones | S&P 500 | NASDAQ | 10-Year Note | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10,210.77 | 1,090.94 | 2,148.77 | 34.86 |
Oil *
77.52
|
|
UP
187.35
|
UP
21.64
|
UP
36.33
|
DOWN
0.17
|
10 Yr
3.49%
SPDR Gold
108.08
|
|
+1.87%
|
+2.02%
|
+1.72%
|
-0.49%
|
Data delayed 20 minutes |















