PBP has pretty much behaved as hoped for. It's up a little, while the S&P 500 has gone down a little. DNH is meant to be a substitute for iShares MSCI EAFE Fund(EFA Quote), and although DNH has done about the same as EFA since the portfolio's inception, I still think DNH is the better hold because it has zero exposure to Japan compared to almost 20% for EFA. Also, DNH's very heavy (87%) exposure to Australia provides for a better zig zag effect with its 0.678 correlation to the S&P 500 vs. 0.825 for EFA.
The idea behind IGF is that no matter what is going on with the stock-market cycle, money must be spent on infrastructure. The flow of capital creates a tailwind that could allow for price appreciation even in a down market. While IGF has done better than the S&P 500, it has not done much better -- it's down a little. JJA has delivered, not only with a 16% return, but also with a 0.02 correlation (according to PortfolioScience.com). (The chart looks like a negative correlation to me.)![]() |
| Click here for larger image. |
- Loading Comments...
- Loading Comments...
Recent Comments
Featured Photo Galleries
| Dow Jones | S&P 500 | NASDAQ | 10-Year Note | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10,308.26 | 1,096.07 | 2,180.05 | 34.87 |
Oil *
73.22
|
|
DOWN
132.86
|
DOWN
13.11
|
DOWN
26.86
|
DOWN
1.09
|
10 Yr
3.49%
SPDR Gold
107.34
|
|
-1.27%
|
-1.18%
|
-1.22%
|
-3.03%
|
Data delayed 20 minutes |















