This Day On The Street
Continue to site
This account is pending registration confirmation. Please click on the link within the confirmation email previously sent you to complete registration.
Need a new registration confirmation email? Click here

Apple's Got Its Mojo Back

This column was originally published on RealMoney on Nov. 7 at 8:53 a.m. EST. It's being republished as a bonus for readers.

If you read many of the columns on RealMoney, you'll note several writers voice a reliance on their feel for the market. From fundies like Jim Cramer to technicians like Rev Shark, "the gut" seems to be an important aspect of trading. This approach is summed up by a recent email I received from long-time reader C.I.:
Gary, I believe picking stocks is as intuitive as it is analytical. With 20 years investment experience, I have learned to trust my "gut" and it usually does not let me down. When my gut feel is wrong, I have a greater degree of comfort in my decisions, even though they may be wrong, because I listened to myself and acted accordingly. If I am going to lose a football game, it won't be because my best running back did not have 20 carries and someone else was calling plays. C.I.

First, let me state I agree with C.I. Relying on your intuition and feel does work in the market. Let me also say I believe it is inferior to a pure statistical method. I make that statement for two reasons.

One, if you rely a lot on intuition and are objective about testing it, I believe you will find it is accurate no more than 50% of the time. In my experience, most people are biased when remembering how right their gut was and tend to ignore all the times they were wrong. An accurate accounting will usually prove sobering.

In addition, even if one's intuition is helpful, it is still inferior to a raw statistical approach because while a gut-feel player may be right more than he is wrong, that advantage is mitigated by the fact he doesn't take as many trades as pure-data man.

As an example, gut feel may look at 100 trades, take only 20 that look great, and be right on 15 of them. Pure data, however, might take all 100 trades, and be right on 50 of them. So while his batting average is lower, the sheer number of his attempts can result in overall higher profits.

Finally, I've found the intuitive approach hard to pin down. If my trades didn't work that day, was my feel off? Was it the market? Or did I simply have an upset stomach? Without pure data to test, it's difficult to say.

Of course, one has to always do what's best, and if that requires you to use your gut, so be it. Over time, though, I believe that approach will cost you profits.

Today, the Nasdaq, Apple Computer (AAPL - Get Report), EnCana (ECA - Get Report), Sirius (SIRI - Get Report), Golden West Financial (GDW) and Kohl's (KSS - Get Report).

Charts produced by TC2000, which is a registered trademark of Worden Brothers Inc.

And that is the final word from Cameron Indoor Stadium, where everyone is loving my Blue Devils to take the NCAA hoop title. Like I said last year, though, I think they'll come up just a bit short, this time to Michigan State.

P.S. from Editor-in-Chief, Dave Morrow:
It's always been my opinion that it pays to have more -- not fewer -- expert market views and analyses when you're making investing or trading decisions. That's why I recommend you take advantage of our free trial offer to RealMoney premium Web site, where you'll get in-depth commentary and money-making strategies from over 50 Wall Street pros, including Jim Cramer. Take my advice -- try it now.
Gary B. Smith is a freelance writer who trades for his own account from his Maryland home using technical analysis. Under no circumstances does the information in this column represent a recommendation to buy or sell stocks. Smith writes a daily technical analysis column for and also produces a daily premium product for called The Chartman's Top Stocks -- click here for a free two-week trial. While Gary cannot provide investment advice or recommendations, he appreciates your feedback; click here to send him an email.

Check Out Our Best Services for Investors

Action Alerts PLUS

Portfolio Manager Jim Cramer and Director of Research Jack Mohr reveal their investment tactics while giving advanced notice before every trade.

Product Features:
  • $2.5+ million portfolio
  • Large-cap and dividend focus
  • Intraday trade alerts from Cramer
Quant Ratings

Access the tool that DOMINATES the Russell 2000 and the S&P 500.

Product Features:
  • Buy, hold, or sell recommendations for over 4,300 stocks
  • Unlimited research reports on your favorite stocks
  • A custom stock screener
Stocks Under $10

David Peltier uncovers low dollar stocks with serious upside potential that are flying under Wall Street's radar.

Product Features:
  • Model portfolio
  • Stocks trading below $10
  • Intraday trade alerts
14-Days Free
Only $9.95
14-Days Free
Dividend Stock Advisor

David Peltier identifies the best of breed dividend stocks that will pay a reliable AND significant income stream.

Product Features:
  • Diversified model portfolio of dividend stocks
  • Updates with exact steps to take - BUY, HOLD, SELL
Trifecta Stocks

Every recommendation goes through 3 layers of intense scrutiny—quantitative, fundamental and technical analysis—to maximize profit potential and minimize risk.

Product Features:
  • Model Portfolio
  • Intra Day Trade alerts
  • Access to Quant Ratings
Real Money

More than 30 investing pros with skin in the game give you actionable insight and investment ideas.

Product Features:
  • Access to Jim Cramer's daily blog
  • Intraday commentary and news
  • Real-time trading forums
Only $49.95
14-Days Free
14-Days Free
AAPL $110.78 0.36%
ECA $7.58 5.57%
KSS $46.83 3.15%
SIRI $3.87 1.04%
FB $94.01 2.11%


Chart of I:DJI
DOW 16,776.43 +304.06 1.85%
S&P 500 1,987.05 +35.69 1.83%
NASDAQ 4,781.2640 +73.4890 1.56%

Free Reports

Top Rated Stocks Top Rated Funds Top Rated ETFs