Power Stocks Lose Their Juice

 

Four Undervalued Stocks

Are there any cheap stocks in these sectors given this weakness? I set my screens on the energy and public utilities sectors to identify companies within these sectors that have cheapened enough to become at least 40% undervalued according to my model. Three energy stocks and one utility passed this test, but all four have negative weekly chart profiles.

I emphasize my valuations here because there are only four stocks in the energy and public utilities sector that trade above $5 per share and are at least 40% undervalued. Given the negative technicals in the sector, buying any of these stocks is not a sure thing, but it is a way that traders can try to capture a rebound. My model suggests that investors should look at their portfolios carefully and be prepared to reduce holdings on strength, as energy and public utilities are unlikely to power your portfolios going into the end of the third quarter as well as they have in the past.

At 49.0% undervalued, El Paso(EP Quote) is the most undervalued of the group, with fair value at $22.43. Its weekly chart profile is negative, with the stock trading below both its five-week modified moving average at $12.29 and its 200-week simple moving average at $12.68. I show risk to my quarterly value level at $11.05, where my model suggests buyers should emerge. Below that is the 52-week low at $8.59.

Valero Energy(VLO Quote) is slightly less extreme, at 42.6% undervalued, making its fair value $164.95. The weekly chart profile is negative with the five-week MMA at $101.56. I show risk to my quarterly value level at $84.08, where buyers should emerge.

National Fuel Gas(NFG Quote) is 41.4% undervalued, making fair value $51.39. The weekly chart profile is negative with the five-week MMA at $31.33. I show risk to my quarterly value level at $28.45, where my model suggests buyers should emerge.

Least undervalued is Quicksilver Resources(KWK Quote), which is 40.3% below its fair value of $60.76. Its weekly chart profile is also negative, with the five-week MMA at $41.26. There's risk to my semiannual value level at $32.52, where my model suggests buyers should emerge.

  • Loading Comments...
  •  
1 2
Next >

SHARE:

  • email
  • print
  • comment
  • digg
  • delicious
  • linkedin
Richard Suttmeier is president of Global Market Consultants, Ltd., chief market strategist for Joseph Stevens & Co., a full service brokerage firm located in Lower Manhattan, and the author of TheStreet.com Technology Report newsletter. At the time of publication, he had no positions in any of the securities mentioned in this column, but holdings can change at any time. Early in his career, Suttmeier became the first U.S. Treasury Bond Trader at Bache. He later began the government bond division at L. F. Rothschild. Suttmeier went on to form Global Market Consultants as an independent third-party research provider, producing reports covering the technicals of the U.S. capital markets. He also has been U.S. Treasury Strategist for Smith Barney and chief financial strategist for William R. Hough. Suttmeier holds a bachelor's degree from the Georgia Institute of Technology and a master's degree from Polytechnic University. Under no circumstances does the information in this commentary represent a recommendation to buy or sell stocks. While he cannot provide investment advice or recommendations, he invites you to send your feedback -- click here to send him an email.

Recent Comments





Connect with TheStreet

Dow Jones S&P 500 NASDAQ 10-Year Note
10,501.05 1,114.11 2,212.10 35.46
Oil *
71.84
UP
29.55
UP
7.70
UP
21.79
UP
0.06
10 Yr
3.55%
SPDR Gold
110.24
+0.28%
+0.70%
+0.99%
+0.17%
Data delayed 20 minutes

Brokerage Partners

TheStreet Premium Services

All Services