But the big market for Exanta and AstraZeneca will be in chronic uses, such as atrial fibrillation or the installation of a mechanical heart valve. These patients would have to take Exanta for the rest of their lives. AstraZeneca is seeking European Union approval for expanded applications of the drug.
The FDA "will likely restrict access to this drug, and probably deservedly so," said Anderson, who has a neutral rating on the stock. (He doesn't own shares of AstraZeneca, and his firm doesn't have an investment-banking relationship with the company.)
Anderson also noted than one FDA reviewer questioned whether Exanta is better than a placebo in terms of efficacy for preventing blood clots in patients with atrial fibrillation. He said the viewer also questioned whether Exanta is better than today's primary pill, which is sold generically as Warfarin and under the brand name Coumadin.
Much of the FDA staff report focused on potential liver damage, as measured by significant increases of an enzyme called ALT. The prospect of liver damage is a key issue in the FDA's evaluation. The agency is bound to be cautious because some drugs with lower liver-damage test results than Exanta's have been approved, only to be withdrawn later by manufacturers, says a recent research report by Bear Stearns.
The FDA says that drug-induced liver injury is the top cause of acute liver failure, a rare disease that can produce critical illness in a few days, cause death or necessitate a liver transplant. It's the leading reason why drugs are removed from the market and why the FDA requires restricted use of certain drugs and special monitoring of patients.
The FDA staff report Thursday said the severity and rate of liver toxicity "is substantial with long term treatment" of Exanta, adding that preliminary analyses "suggest the risk of severe liver injury begins within the first month of therapy."
The FDA staff report noted that AstraZeneca had submitted a plan for monitoring potential liver damage from Exanta, but the report said the plan "does not address the possible risks" of delayed liver toxicity after short-term use of Exanta or the risk of heart attack that an FDA report on clinical safety had detected. In addition, reversal of Exanta-induced bleeding "was not addressed by the sponsor," the staff report said.
The staff report recommends that the advisory committee ask a lot of questions on Friday, including whether more tests are needed to assess liver toxicity and the risk of heart attack, as well as the crucial question: Do the benefits exceed the risk?
The FDA is expected to act on AstraZeneca's request in late October. The agency doesn't have to follow its advisory committee's recommendations, but it usually does so.
Depending on how well Exanta performs,
(MRK - Get Report)
could get a royalty of as much as 20% of sales. That's the residue of a joint venture that Merck formed in 1994 with then independent Astra. The joint venture was restructured into a partnership in 1998, and the partnership was restructured after Astra merged with Britain's Zeneca in 1999.