First things first: If the U.S. comes out of recession as swiftly and as strongly as investors seem to expect, there are going to be a lot of red-faced economists in 2002.
Stock and bond markets have been forecasting a robust recovery. The benchmark S&P 500 climbed 6% following Sept. 10 on the belief that, even in the aftermath of the terror attacks on America, corporate earnings will grow quickly this year. Meanwhile, the yield on the benchmark 10-year Treasury rose to 5.1% from 4.8% in expectation that the Fed soon will be raising rates to prevent the economy from growing too quickly and courting inflation. None of this is completely far-fetched: The Fed cut rates 11 times last year, fiscal policy is incredibly stimulative and, historically speaking, economic growth has been very rapid coming out of recession. But it is very hard to find economists as sanguine as the markets are on 2002. Most believe the economy has yet to reach the trough (many investors believe that it already has), reckoning that recent signs of stepped-up business activity are a snapback from the severely depressed levels that followed Sept. 11 rather than the start of something new. The economy's trough, according to the consensus, will come sometime late in the first quarter. Economists also believe that the first stages of recovery will be muted.Sonic Bust?
The difference between this recession and most past downturns is that this time around, it wasn't the specter of inflation and the Fed's clamping down on inflation that caused problems for the economy, but companies gone amok spending on tech equipment that was often overpriced and often unnecessary. The first half of 2000 was the peak not just of a stock investing bubble but of a business investment bubble. When businesses started reining in investment, the companies that made all that tech equipment, which had been steadily building their infrastructures in anticipation of sustained growth, saw the bottom fall out. This business-led downturn has been hard to deal with. For one thing, rate cuts don't work as quickly, because rate cuts more directly help the consumer and housing, both of which have held up well through the recession. For another, with all of that investing in new equipment, corporate America has scads of excess capacity. With the capacity utilization rate at 75% (its lowest since the early 1980s), companies aren't running efficiently.| Slow and Steady Wins the Race Early strength makes for a short expansion |
|||
| Recession's Trough | GDP Growth Following Quarter | Length of Subsequent Expansion | |
| 1971 Q1 | 11.7% | 36 months | |
| 1975 Q2 | 3.6 | 58 | |
| 1980 Q4 | 7.3 | 12 | |
| 1983 Q1 | 4.7 | 92 | |
| 1991 Q2 | 2.3 | 120 | |
| Source: Census Bureau; National Bureau of Economic Research | |||
Dubya
But business investment, the third piece of the growth puzzle, won't return until fresh demand has sopped up all the excess capacity. "Even going out to 2003, it's going to be hard to boost business investment again," says Jones. "I'm beginning to think it might be a W-shaped recovery, with one leg up in the middle of this year and the next leg later."| How Low Can You Go? The fed funds target gets cut |
| Source: Yardeni.com |
Between the Tackles
Most economists reckon neither extreme will occur. Instead, the U.S. economy will revive, but low utilization rates and weak overseas economies will make it hard for companies to raise prices. "Pricing power looks pretty weak," says Morgan Stanley chief U.S. economist Richard Berner. "That's a testimony to extra capacity and that consumers have long had the upper hand. They're aggressively seeking and demanding discounts and bargains." Abetted, Berner adds, by the ability the Internet gives them to do rapid price checks and make sure they're not getting rooked.| U.S. Companies Twiddle Their Thumbs Capacity utilization plunges to lows |
| Source: Federal Reserve |
Featured Photo Galleries
Sign up for our FREE newsletters now.
See All
Sponsored by:




