Dynegy , the Houston energy company that announced a deep restructuring and an earnings warning this
week, stands to lose as much as $200 million from a natural gas pipeline
deal that was struck with Enron in the middle of this year.
The energy company hasn't volunteered details of the pipeline transaction,
or outlined any other deals in which Enron owes Dynegy money. Instead, Dynegy has merely stated that Enron owes it $75 million after subtracting its own obligations to Enron. As a result, any evidence of undisclosed Enron blowback could further unnerve Dynegy investors, who already have severely penalized the stock following Enron's collapse. Dynegy shares slipped 80 cents Tuesday to $20.90.
Spokesman Steve Stengel declined to say how much of a loss
Dynegy expects to book from the pipeline transaction, but he said his
company had included the deal when it calculated its net exposure to Enron.
Enron didn't respond to a request for comment.
Capacity
In the pipeline transaction, Dynegy envisioned that Enron
would pay it $2.75 million a month until 2014, according to a person
familiar with the pricing. But with Enron having
filed for bankruptcy protection on Dec. 2, Dynegy
now will struggle to collect anything close to the full amount Enron owes
under this agreement.
Monday, Dynegy said its net exposure to its onetime rival was $75
million after taxes. That comes to $105 million before taxes, using
Dynegy's latest corporate tax rate. Dynegy, like other energy
companies, has repeatedly turned down requests to publicly isolate the
amount it's owed by Enron.
Dynegy agreed to buy
Enron in early November, but
pulled
out of the merger at the end of the month.
The pipeline deal could raise questions about the way Dynegy does
business, and it could lead to greater scrutiny of its books. After Enron's
collapse, auditors are expected to clamp down on the aggressive accounting
practices that allegedly became widespread at energy traders.
It appears that the pipeline deal was one in which Dynegy was eager to
book gains. The company booked as much as $50 million of upfront revenue
from the pipeline arrangement, according to the person familiar with its
details. At the same time as the pipeline deal was done, Dynegy also
recorded revenue of about $50 million from a related agreement to buy electricity
from the Scriba, N.Y.-based Independence Station power plant, this person
adds.
The 1,042-megawatt plant is owned by power-plant operator Sithe
Energies. The pipeline capacity that Dynegy agreed to take on from Enron
can be used to supply Independence with natural gas. Independence can use that gas to produce
the electricity that Dynegy had contracted to buy.
New York-based Sithe declined to comment.
Swap Meet
How did Dynegy get into this deal? In the first half of 2001, Enron
and Sithe worked to restructure a complex deal originally set in the
mid-'90s. As part of this deal's recasting, Enron agreed to assume from
Sithe obligations to pay regulated tariffs for capacity on five natural gas
pipelines through 2014.
However, because these tariffs were uneconomically high, Enron didn't
want to keep them. It sought to pass them on. After negotiations, Dynegy
agreed on June 30 to pay the high regulated tariffs. But in return, Enron
had to pay Dynegy $2.75 million a month. This offsetting payment brought
the net cost of the pipeline capacity down to a level that Dynegy thought
reasonable.
Dynegy, however, is almost certainly not receiving the $2.75 million
anymore, now that Enron is under bankruptcy protection. If so, it's having
to pay the regulated tariffs with no offsetting cushion. Over 14 years,
those Enron payments are worth $465 million.
Using a discount rate of 8%, to give them a net present value for
gain-booking purposes, the remaining payments come to about $260 million.
Absent a full explanation from Dynegy, it's reasonable to assume that the
company may have to record something close to that figure as a loss,
though, of course, Dynegy would expect to recoup some fractional amount in
Enron's bankruptcy proceedings.
The Lost $260 Million?
Enron's pipeline deal with Dynegy
|
| Step 1
|
Enron wants out of
long-term deal with Sithe
|
| Step 2
|
To get out, Sithe says Enron must
assume uneconomic pipeline obligations
|
| Step 3
|
Enron agrees, but would rather pass
on the obligations
|
| Step 4
|
As part of a power deal with Sithe,
Dynegy agrees to take the obligations from Enron
|
| Step 5
|
But Dynegy also demands a partially
offsetting payment from Enron of $2.75 million a month
|
| Step 6
|
Enron agrees
|
| Step 7
|
Discounted Enron payments worth about
$260 million to Dynegy
|
| Step 8
|
Dynegy agrees to buy Enron, but later
pulls out of the deal
|
| Step 9
|
Enron files for bankruptcy
protection, payment stream to Dynegy in doubt.
|
| Step 10
|
Dynegy says net Enron exposure is $75
million after taxes
|
| Source: Detox
|
If the end loss is as much as $200 million, Dynegy must owe Enron
a considerable sum of money to get its net exposure down to the estimated
$105 million before taxes. If Dynegy does owe Enron large sums, it may be
for sizable gas purchases from Enron, which made markets in natural gas and
other energy commodities.
Dynegy is probably hoping that it can include the $260 million amount
when it comes to settle its debts with Enron in any bankruptcy proceedings.
But it's not yet clear that the courts will allow trade creditors such as Dynegy to use this so-called netting, because it may put them ahead of
nontrade creditors.
Upfront
The person familiar with the deal also alleges that Dynegy booked
revenue from this pipeline capacity in the second quarter of this year.
Once Dynegy assumed the capacity obligations, it recorded profits by
modeling gas purchases and sales at different points on the pipeline, this
person claims. The company recorded $25 million to $50 million of gains by
doing this, the person adds. Dynegy didn't comment on whether it booked
upfront profits from this deal. The pipeline companies in these capacity
arrangements included: ANR Pipeline, CMS Panhandle Eastern Pipe Line and
Great Lakes Gas Transmission.
Separate from the pipeline deal, Dynegy also agreed at the end of June
to pay the Independence Station fees of about $70 million a year to
produce power, which Dynegy intends to market. This deal isn't affected in
any way by Enron's collapse.
But, again, Dynegy may have been too enthusiastic in booking upfront
profits from this so-called tolling agreement. This person says Dynegy
structured the deal so that it could book some $50 million in trading
profits in the second quarter. It did this partly by using an internal
model that factored in power prices in the distant future, this person
claims.