![]() |
This just doesn't add up. There hasn't been an economic slowdown in Europe, and there have been no international events to reduce the desire to travel. One therefore must assume that it was a tough quarter primarily because the online travel players are fighting like crazy for market share, and because online travel as a whole has stopped growing as fast as it was. Neither conclusion bodes well for IAC. One way in which IAC has tried to gain share is by splurging on marketing -- something it was criticized for in the first quarter. True, second-quarter marketing spending retreated from first-quarter levels. But it fell only slightly -- to $301 million, or 20% of revenue, from $309 million, or 21% of revenue, in the previous period. Moreover, there is a good chance that second-quarter bookings and revenue would have been a lot lower without strong marketing spending in both quarters. Low-Hanging FruitInvestors must grasp one very important wrinkle to the IAC story -- that it has achieved sweet margins in the past by taking cut-price room inventory from hotels when demand to travel slumped, due to terrorism and war. In the aftermath of 9/11, Hotels.com scarfed up cheap rooms, and IAC did so again in the run-up to the Iraq War of 2003. IAC bears always used to point to this important contribution to profitability, and bulls would routinely downplay it. However, on the call, Diller emphasized this factor when explaining why IAC wasn't able to get so many attractively priced rooms in 2004, vs. 2003, when the war was looming or actually happening.
Go to NEXT PAGE
In keeping with TSC's editorial policy, Peter Eavis doesn't own or short individual stocks. He also doesn't invest in hedge funds or other private investment partnerships. He welcomes your feedback and invites you to send any to peter.eavis@thestreet.com.
Brokerage Partners
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||