Do the Hawks Know the Stakes of This Game?

Time for the inflation hawks to recognize the stakes. Throughout the discussion as articulated in the papers and on TV, you hear of only two things with regard to the Fed, that the fundamentals are sound enough to stop cutting and that inflation worries command a shift to higher rates.

In the interest of understanding what has been happening in this market -- an unrelenting decline in all but the oil and fertilizer stocks since the Fed floated this stance -- you have to get your arms around the idea that this is it, an obituary, for all of the banks that need housing prices to increase and bad loans to decrease. Because despite the sound and quite cerebral approach the hawks are taking, unless we get a giant FHA bill out of Congress, you can pretty much be assured that most of the big banks in this country will be so radically under-reserved when they report that we might as well just give up on them.

How about that bill? It seems suddenly likely and it is important, I am not denying it. If we could get the FHA to have $300 billion in lending capacity and we agree that the FHA is basically going to have to take a beating, than you can make a case that we are only about a year away from a turn -- that was the tenor of the CSFB housing upgrade story yesterday, although it didn't rely on the FHA much at all in its prognostications.

(Amazingly, the FHA has taken a lead role, as the CSFB piece explains well, in bailing out the captive homebuilder loan operations by issuing exactly the kind of no-money-down junk that got us in trouble in the first place. It is pretty astoundingly stupid.)

But the FHA is no substitute for the reliquification that is needed to save Bank of America (BAC - commentary - Cramer's Take), WaMu (WM - commentary - Cramer's Take), Wachovia (WB - commentary - Cramer's Take) and Citigroup (C - commentary - Cramer's Take). If you were on their boards, you would be at the Fed, saying, "If you just give us 0.5% on the rates, we can invest that money at, say, 1.5% on the curve and rebuild our equity."

And that's the real cost of today's discussion. When the Fed says it is done, that closes the remaining door for banks to raise money. Now all they will have is the hope that there is still enough stupid value and sovereign money in the pipe to do more equity rounds.

ALL JIM CRAMER BLOG ENTRIES | POST A COMMENT | READ COMMENTS  

---

Jim Cramer is a director and co-founder of TheStreet.com. He contributes daily market commentary for TheStreet.com's sites and serves as an adviser to the company's CEO. Outside contributing columnists for TheStreet.com and RealMoney.com, including Cramer, may, from time to time, write about stocks in which they have a position. In such cases, appropriate disclosure is made. To see his personal portfolio and find out what trades Cramer will make before he makes them, sign up for Action Alerts PLUS. Watch Cramer on "Mad Money" weeknights on CNBC. To order Cramer's newest book -- "Jim Cramer's Stay Mad for Life: Get Rich, Stay Rich (Make Your Kids Even Richer)," click here. Click here to order "Mad Money: Watch TV, Get Rich," click here to order "Real Money: Sane Investing in an Insane World," click here to get "You Got Screwed!" and click here for Cramer's autobiography, "Confessions of a Street Addict." While he cannot provide personalized investment advice or recommendations, he appreciates your feedback and invites you to send comments by clicking here.

TheStreet.com has a revenue-sharing relationship with Amazon.com under which it receives a portion of the revenue from Amazon.com purchases by customers directed there from TheStreet.com.