![]() |
It's so chic to take shots at eBay these days. The guidance was a bummer. The quarter was a bummer. The arrogance is a bummer. The valuation? Look, no one likes to pay 50 times earnings for anything. You won't find me buying it. However, if it drops from here, if it ever were to sell at 40 times earnings, given its 40% growth rate, is that too expensive? Must all stocks sell at 20 times earnings or less to get adherents? Mind you, I think that eBay's a very tough stock to own. Like Google (GOOG - commentary - Cramer's Take), the company seems to be doing little to help itself. Let's understand that the eBay chink, as explored by the press, is that the sellers don't like the listing fee increases. To me, eBay's raising prices to please Wall Street, which is always stupid. But what if the discounts that it is now giving stick? What if it wins back the recalcitrant managers? What if eBay is still the only game in town, even after the price increases? One of the dumbest criticisms I hear about eBay is that if you raise prices enough, the sellers will go elsewhere. Where? To the newspapers? To magazines? To television? Oh, please.
Remember, the Achilles' heel of eBay is not eBay itself; it's the others. If someone could offer the breadth of buyers and sellers and come in well under eBay in price and still make money, then eBay's still a short.
Go to NEXT PAGE
James J. Cramer is a director and co-founder of TheStreet.com. He contributes daily market commentary for TheStreet.com's sites and serves as an adviser to the company's CEO. Outside contributing columnists for TheStreet.com and RealMoney.com, including Cramer, may, from time to time, write about stocks in which they have a position. In such cases, appropriate disclosure is made.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||