Action Alerts PLUS
RealMoney Silver
Stocks Under $10
Options Alerts
Top Stocks
View All


Now, enjoy the good life every day!

RSSRSS FEEDS
PODPODCASTS



RealMoney.com: Investing
Print This Story

ASH, SCX, RSC and CONN Are Safe and Cheap

By Tim Melvin
RealMoney.com Contributor

3/20/2008 11:33 AM EDT
Click here for more stories by Tim Melvin
 
Try Jim Cramer's Action Alerts PLUS
CLICK HERE NOW

One of my constant themes is looking for cheap stocks with a decent business that you would not mind owning for several years, no matter what the price does in the short term. Recently, I wrote about Walter Schloss, who is the master of this approach and used it to beat the market for almost 50 years. In that article, I mentioned a couple of stocks that met his criteria and said I would return to the subject soon. Soon has arrived.

 
When I ran the screen for stocks that sold below book value, had very little debt and officers and directors owned a significant amount of the shares, I came up with a list of 39 stocks. I already wrote about two of them, Hilltop Holdings (HTH - commentary - Cramer's Take) and Elron Electronic (ELRN - commentary - Cramer's Take). Today, I went through the other 37 names and applied credit scoring to each company.

The idea was to come up with stocks that were not only cheap but also had staying power and a good chance of turning around in the future. As expected, since one of the criteria was low levels of debt, all of the companies had a good Z-Score. I also used the Piotroski scale described in an earlier article. This measure not only measures balance sheet safety but also indentifies signs that business conditions are improving and likely to continue to do so.

I came up with four companies that not only have a Z-Score over 3 but also scored at least 5 out of a possible 9 on the Piotroski scale. They are far from sexy companies; they are not in the economic sweet spot by any measure. They are, however, very cheap, financially sound and likely to be much higher in price a few years from now. I would not buy them for my trading portfolio, but they make a lot of sense for my long-term "buy it and forget it" account.

Go to NEXT PAGE


 RELATED STORIES

Investing
Despite the Selloff, the Market Still Isn't Cheap
3/20/2008 10:40 AM EDT
Stocks may look attractive in comparison to skimpy bond yields, but the market's P/E ratio isn't historically cheap.

Investing
Are Bonds Headed for a Correction?
3/20/2008 8:11 AM EDT
The Fed's cuts could exacerbate inflation concerns.

Investing
Four Reasons to Believe in a Bottom
3/19/2008 3:46 PM EDT
Monday will mark the turnaround -- here's why.



At the time of publication, Melvin had no positions in the stocks mentioned, although positions may change at any time.

Tim Melvin is a writer from Stevensville, Maryland, who spent 20 years a stockbroker, the last 15 as a Vice President of Investments with a regional firm in the Mid Atlantic area. Under no circumstances does the information in this column represent a recommendation to buy or sell stocks. Melvin appreciates your feedback; click here to send him an email.




Partner Center


Advertisement



Write us!
Order reprints of TSC articles.

Investor Relations | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Conflicts Policy | Corrections | Internet Index | Advertise | FAQ
Site Map | Who's Who | Reader Feedback | Employment | Contact Us
RSSSubscribe to our RSS Feed
© 1996- TheStreet.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
TheStreet.com's enterprise databases running Oracle are professionally monitored and managed by Pythian Remote DBA.