|
TheStreet Mobile |
MainStreet |
StockPickr |
BankingMyWay |
Jim Cramer |
Doug Kass |
Don Dion's ETFs |
Try Action Alerts PLUS - FREE
Sorry that you couldn't find the page you wanted.Here are a couple of ways that can help you find that information successfully.Content Search: Quote Search: (Stocks, ETFs, Mutual Funds) TheStreet Directory
More From TheStreetLatest Headlines |
|
Commentary: Numbers Game *New* Alerts! Please click here...
First, we'll take a look at overall gross domestic product growth for the current cycle and for past downturns. While all downturns are painful, each has its own unique characteristics.
Overall economic activity, as measured by GDP growth, has been stronger in this cycle than in any other downturn. This performance could be considered remarkable, given the challenges the economy has faced: the tripling of oil prices from 1999 through last year, the collapse of the dot-coms and telcos and the horrendous slide in the stock prices of such widely owned names as Cisco (CSCO:Nasdaq - news - commentary) and Lucent (LU:NYSE - news - commentary). The big question is where the economy is headed from here. I know many bond investors who look at the economy's resilience combined with the aggressive Fed easing this year and fear the economy will come roaring back. I know other investors who look at the excesses that built up at the end of the past decade and feel that the economy is only beginning a long slide. What has really kept the economy going is personal spending, which accounts for about two-thirds of economic activity. I think the course of spending will determine whether the economy falls into a traditional, full-blown recession.
So far, consumption has turned in the second-best performance of the downturns highlighted. Only the 1969 recession, which was virtually over at this point in the cycle, turned in a stronger performance. The real weakness in the economy has been on the manufacturing side.
Industrial production's performance during this cycle has been weaker than that of any except the 1981 recession. The current decline has been more relentless than any of these; the other cycles had at least one up month. In contrast to the horrible production numbers, employment has held up relatively well.
Payrolls have dipped during the past few months, but not nearly as severely as they typically do during a downturn. That may be because, until this year, the hardest task that many companies faced was finding and retaining qualified employees. Unemployment is still relatively low, so companies seem to be reluctant to part with their workers unless absolutely necessary. In the short run, cutting production more than payrolls can be disastrous for profitability and productivity. But the relatively low level of job declines has also allowed incomes to continue rising and has supported personal consumption.
A few months ago, I wrote that I didn't see consumption accelerating greatly (other than for a brief spike due to tax refunds) nor falling sharply. These data strengthen my view. If the economy does start to rebound, hiring probably won't be very strong, given how little payrolls have been cut during this slowdown. That means incomes won't rise very quickly at the start of the recovery and that profitability could rebound faster than the economy. If the economy worsens and payrolls are trimmed more, I think that long-term bond yields will fall and the resulting increase in refinancings will help to support the consumer. The best news in this cycle relative to others has been on inflation. In the past 30 years, recessions have tended to coincide with surges in inflation, usually caused by a jump in oil prices. The tripling of crude-oil prices from early 1999 through the end of last year had the potential to produce a large ramp-up in inflation, yet the performance of the consumer price index during this slowdown has been lowest of these cycles.
The current economy has performed both better and worse than it typically does in a downturn. As I've said before, I think we're in a 1991-type of environment, where the overall economy doesn't accelerate sharply or drop precipitously. If that's true and if energy prices have really topped out, then inflation can work its way lower and provide support for stock and bond prices. These data, along with the relationship of the economy to the markets that I examined last week, make me more comfortable owning more stocks and bonds than I did at the beginning of the year. You might reach a different conclusion about the economy and will thus want to have a different asset mix than I do. Nevertheless, you can use this information to get some perspective, and that's an integral part of the investing process. Brian Reynolds is a Chartered Financial Analyst who spent more than 16 years as a fixed-income portfolio manager and economist at David L. Babson & Co. in Cambridge, Mass. He currently writes and lectures about investment issues and trades for his own account. At the time of publication, he had no positions in any of the securities mentioned in this column, although holdings can change at any time. Under no circumstances does the information in this column represent a recommendation to buy or sell. He welcomes feedback at Brian Reynolds.
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
![]()
|
Content Search:
Quote Search:
(Stocks, ETFs, Mutual Funds)
TheStreet Directory
| Dow Jones | S&P 500 | NASDAQ | 10-Year Note | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10,388.90 | 1,105.98 | 2,194.35 | 34.83 |
Oil *
77.74
|
|
UP
22.75
|
UP
6.06
|
UP
21.21
|
UP
1.03
|
10 Yr
3.48%
SPDR Gold
113.75
|
|
+0.22%
|
+0.55%
|
+0.98%
|
+3.05%
|
Data delayed 20 minutes |