DOW
loading...
NASDAQ
loading...
S&P
loading...




Action Alerts PLUS
RealMoney Silver
Top Gun Trader
Stocks Under $10
Options Alerts
Top Stocks
View All


Now, enjoy the good life every day!

RSSRSS FEEDS
PODPODCASTS


RealMoney.com: Value Perspective
Print This Story

What Warren Buffett Can Teach Microsoft

By Mohnish Pabrai
RealMoney.com Contributor

1/2/2003 12:59 PM EST
 

In the very early cash-strapped days of Microsoft (MSFT - commentary - Cramer's Take), Bill Gates made a resolution that he'd get the company to the point that it always had enough cash to run for a year, even if it never received a dime from anyone.

Today, with annual expenses of $20 billion and cash and investments of $54 billion, Microsoft can theoretically operate with zero revenue for nearly three years. Are the dividend mongers right in putting pressure on the company to pay out all the excess cash to shareholders? Alternately, shouldn't they spend at least $30-odd billion on a large stock buyback?

Contrary to popular opinion, Microsoft is a fragile business. While the company has a wide range of products and services ranging from Hotmail to MSNBC to Xbox, more than 68% of revenue and 107% of operating profit come from just two product families -- Windows and Office.

Without them, the company wouldn't be making a dime, even with the $10 billion in revenue the other products bring in. Windows and Office need upgrades to make money, and upgrades are only compelling with revolutionary improvements. DOS to Windows was revolutionary. Office 2000 to Office XP is ho-hum.

Windows Server, SQL Server, MSN, Hotmail, Expedia, Xbox, Microsoft Press, Microsoft Consulting, Great Plains, bCentral, Pocket PC and Windows CE are all terrific well-positioned Microsoft offerings. Many are market leaders. Yet, in aggregate, they drain about a billion a year from the company's coffers.

Depends on Upgrades

One might argue that Windows and Office are so ubiquitous in our everyday lives that, by themselves, they make the Microsoft business-model bulletproof. Well, not quite.

The problem for Microsoft in developed markets like the U.S. is that unit growth in PCs is anemic. The heady days when the installed base of PCs posted double-digit gains every year are behind us, and Microsoft is heavily dependent on upgrades. Without the upgrade revenue, both Windows and Office revenue would shrink dramatically.

Go to NEXT PAGE



Mohnish Pabrai is the managing partner of Pabrai Investment Funds, an Illinois-based value-centric group of investment funds. At time of publication, Pabrai was long Berkshire Hathaway, although holdings can change at any time. Under no circumstances does the information in this column represent a recommendation to buy or sell stocks. He appreciates your feedback at mpabrai@thestreet.com. You can access his Web site at www.pabraifunds.com.
Write us!
Order reprints of TSC articles. Top



Brokerage Partners


Click to change or update chart Click to change or update chart Click to change or update chart

Investor Relations | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Conflicts Policy | Corrections | Internet Index | Advertise | FAQ
Site Map | Who's Who | Reader Feedback | Employment | Contact Us
RSSSubscribe to our RSS Feed
© 1996- TheStreet.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
TheStreet.com's enterprise databases running Oracle are professionally monitored and managed by Pythian Remote DBA.