DOW
loading...
NASDAQ
loading...
S&P
loading...




Action Alerts PLUS
RealMoney Silver
Top Gun Trader
Stocks Under $10
Options Alerts
Top Stocks
View All


Now, enjoy the good life every day!

RSSRSS FEEDS
PODPODCASTS


RealMoney.com: Value Perspective
Print This Story

The Danger in Buying the Biggest

By Mohnish Pabrai
RealMoney.com Contributor

12/12/2002 1:02 PM EST
 

There is a French saying: "Buy on the cannons, and sell on the trumpets!" Whether they were speaking metaphorically or not, that's exactly what Sir John Templeton did.

When World War II broke out in Europe in 1939, he borrowed money to buy 100 shares in each of 104 companies selling at $1 a share or less, including 34 companies that were in bankruptcy. Only four turned out to be worthless, and he turned large profits on the others after holding each for an average of four years.

Templeton is considered by many to be, perhaps, the greatest global stock-picker of the 20th century, so it seems worthwhile to subscribe to his proven theory of buying beaten down-stocks at points of maximum pessimism. The reverse of Templeton's approach would be to buy stocks at points of maximum optimism -- and a good place to find optimism is among the most valued businesses in the world.

If you started with $10,000 invested in the most valuable business when the Fortune 500 list was released in April 1987 (that year it was IBM (IBM - commentary - Cramer's Take)) and every year thereafter reinvested the funds in the new (or same) most valued business, by 2002, you would have realized an annualized gain of just 3.3%. Over the same period, the S&P 500 delivered about 10% annualized.


The Most Valuable Fortune 500 Business (1987-2002)
A strategy based on this table would have trailed the S&P
Year Company Market Cap* Revenue* Net Income*
1987 IBM $89 $51 $4.8
1988 IBM 68 59 5.8
1989 IBM 70 63 5.2
1990 IBM 61 69 6.0
1991 IBM 75 65 2.1
1992 Exxon 69 103 4.8
1993 Exxon 78 100 5.3
1994 GE 90 40 5.9
1995 GE 92 43 6.6
1996 GE 126 46 7.3
1997 GE 170 49 8.2
1998 GE 260 56 10.7
1999 Microsoft 419 20 7.6
2000 Microsoft 492 23 9.4
2001 GE 407 68 14.1
2002 GE 401 73 16.6
*Figures in billions.
Source: 1987-2002 Fortune 500 lists and Value Line

While the data demonstrate the superiority of the maximum pessimism investment approach, there is something interesting at work here. An examination of the table shows that none of the most valued businesses got much beyond $100 billion in revenue or $10 billion to $15 billion in net income.

In fact, other than three years, the highest net income of the most valuable business has always been under $10 billion. Why is that? Is there a natural upper limit on revenue or profitability of a business?

Go to NEXT PAGE



Mohnish Pabrai is the managing partner of Pabrai Investment Funds, an Illinois-based value-centric group of investment funds. At time of publication, Pabrai held no positions in any securities mentioned in this column, although holdings can change at any time. Under no circumstances does the information in this column represent a recommendation to buy or sell stocks. He appreciates your feedback at mpabrai@thestreet.com. You can access his Web site at www.pabraifunds.com.

TheStreet.com has a revenue-sharing relationship with Amazon.com under which it receives a portion of the revenue from Amazon purchases by customers directed there from TheStreet.com.

Write us!
Order reprints of TSC articles. Top



Brokerage Partners


Click to change or update chart Click to change or update chart Click to change or update chart

Investor Relations | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Conflicts Policy | Corrections | Internet Index | Advertise | FAQ
Site Map | Who's Who | Reader Feedback | Employment | Contact Us
RSSSubscribe to our RSS Feed
© 1996- TheStreet.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
TheStreet.com's enterprise databases running Oracle are professionally monitored and managed by Pythian Remote DBA.