![]() |
Did anyone really think that Caterpillar (CAT - commentary - Cramer's Take) could earn $4 or $5 in this environment? Did anyone think that Du Pont (DD - commentary - Cramer's Take) wasn't banking on a much better quarter than was possible? Why can't these analysts extrapolate the horrors of a worldwide recession and take numbers for these industrials down to reasonable and doable benchmarks? I am reading through the Du Pont quarter, and it's so obviously terrible that, well, couldn't it have been obvious before the quarter was reported? Do we have to see the minus 3, 4, 5 GDP numbers before we recognize that even the best of the industrials can't come near what they thought they could do when they reported the previous quarter? To me, it is obvious that business stopped in this country, and the world, post Lehman Brothers -- the logical extension of letting an institution that is Too Big To Fail collapse. The fear is too palpable and the risks too great to take on any new business, whether it be in autos or housing, the breadbaskets of places like Du Pont. Unless the workforce has been radically reduced, a company with those core markets will simply succumb to serious losses until the banking system is fixed and the stimulus worked out. Oh, and one more thing, for all of the talk that CAT saw this coming, if you go back to the previous quarter, CAT was banking on a strong second half to see itself through, which is why it didn't make the cuts. Those industrial managers that think we will have a strong second half are dreaming. It is why I like the recession-resistant names -- McDonald's (MCD - commentary - Cramer's Take) -- or the accidentally high yielders -- CAT being one of them -- until the crisis passes. Random musings: Doug Kass articulates the depth of the Buffett problem and the end of the salad days elsewhere here. ... Looking at the Cisco (CSCO - commentary - Cramer's Take) note from yesterday that generated so much interest, I have to believe that Cisco is one of the companies that has scaled back enough to make money. But all in all, I would rather be in General Mills (GIS - commentary - Cramer's Take). ... The futures remain a silly place to get direction, as they were way up early this morning. Worthless barometer. At the time of publication, Cramer was long McDonald's, Cisco and General Mills. Know what you own: Cramer mentions General Mills. Other companies in the packaged foods industry include Pepsi (PEP - commentary - Cramer's Take) and Unilever (UN - commentary - Cramer's Take).
Jim Cramer is co-founder and chairman of TheStreet.com. He contributes daily market commentary for TheStreet.com's sites and serves as an adviser to the company's CEO. Outside contributing columnists for TheStreet.com and RealMoney.com, including Cramer, may, from time to time, write about stocks in which they have a position. In such cases, appropriate disclosure is made. To see his personal portfolio and find out what trades Cramer will make before he makes them, sign up for Action Alerts PLUS. Watch Cramer on "Mad Money" weeknights on CNBC. To order Cramer's newest book -- "Jim Cramer's Stay Mad for Life: Get Rich, Stay Rich (Make Your Kids Even Richer)," click here. Click here to order "Mad Money: Watch TV, Get Rich," click here to order "Real Money: Sane Investing in an Insane World," click here to get "You Got Screwed!" and click here for Cramer's autobiography, "Confessions of a Street Addict." While he cannot provide personalized investment advice or recommendations, he appreciates your feedback and invites you to send comments by clicking here. TheStreet.com has a revenue-sharing relationship with Amazon.com under which it receives a portion of the revenue from Amazon.com purchases by customers directed there from TheStreet.com. Brokerage Partners
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||