![]() |
How bad was that Bear Stearns portfolio? I am beginning to believe that JPMorgan's (JPM - commentary - Cramer's Take) buy of Bear is looking like a big mistake. It can only be justified by what might have been an even bigger problem for JPM -- the collapse of the trades that Bear made, which were being processed by JPM's clearing.
The losses now exceed $400 billion, according to my modeling (if you simply assumed that 50% of the exotic mortgages that were issued from 2005 to 2007 eventually went into default). That's amazing, but it looks like I dramatically underestimated the losses. UNDERESTIMATED! The most egregious issuers of these exotic mortgages were Bear, Merrill Lynch (MER - commentary - Cramer's Take) and Lehman Brothers (LEH - commentary - Cramer's Take). I believe that JPM has taken in a huge number of uninsurable, non-hedgeable mortgage instruments that are a pure write-off. And that means they are probably underwater on everything they took in. Worse still, judging by the Goldman Sachs call (GS - commentary - Cramer's Take), JPMorgan didn't pick up much from the point of view of clearing and prime brokerage. I am really worried JPM got nothing from this deal. JPM is adamant that it got a lot out of the deal, which would imply that I am totally wrong. I can't buy that. Sorry. Not after what we have seen from the other companies that have similar vintages. Second, it's a really bad sign for the next shotgun acquirers. Without insurance from the government for all of these bad portfolios, it simply isn't worth it to call the government and say "I want Nat City (NCC - commentary - Cramer's Take)," or "I want Washington Mutual (WM - commentary - Cramer's Take)." It also makes me think that Countrywide Financial's (CFC - commentary - Cramer's Take) balance sheet will really impair Bank of America (BAC - commentary - Cramer's Take). And I simply don't have any idea how Wachovia (WB - commentary - Cramer's Take) can make it in its current form. Everyone is way too bullish on these companies. They should all be sold. Period.Random musings: It is time to reassess the negative view of gold. The Fed isn't tightening, which is what caused gold to go down. That was a canard. The reversal in these banks is no doubt freaking the Fed out. The idea of raising rates takes away the one reason why you would want to invest in banks: the yield curve allowing the banks to refinance. That logic is sheer lunacy. At the time of publication, Cramer was long Goldman Sachs.
Jim Cramer is a director and co-founder of TheStreet.com. He contributes daily market commentary for TheStreet.com's sites and serves as an adviser to the company's CEO. Outside contributing columnists for TheStreet.com and RealMoney.com, including Cramer, may, from time to time, write about stocks in which they have a position. In such cases, appropriate disclosure is made. To see his personal portfolio and find out what trades Cramer will make before he makes them, sign up for Action Alerts PLUS. Watch Cramer on "Mad Money" weeknights on CNBC. To order Cramer's newest book -- "Jim Cramer's Stay Mad for Life: Get Rich, Stay Rich (Make Your Kids Even Richer)," click here. Click here to order "Mad Money: Watch TV, Get Rich," click here to order "Real Money: Sane Investing in an Insane World," click here to get "You Got Screwed!" and click here for Cramer's autobiography, "Confessions of a Street Addict." While he cannot provide personalized investment advice or recommendations, he appreciates your feedback and invites you to send comments by clicking here. TheStreet.com has a revenue-sharing relationship with Amazon.com under which it receives a portion of the revenue from Amazon.com purchases by customers directed there from TheStreet.com.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||