DOW
loading...
NASDAQ
loading...
S&P
loading...




Action Alerts PLUS
RealMoney Silver
Top Gun Trader
Stocks Under $10
Options Alerts
Top Stocks
View All


Now, enjoy the good life every day!

RSSRSS FEEDS
PODPODCASTS


RealMoney.com: Bonds
Print This Story

Expand Your Time Horizon on Bond Insurers

By Tom Graff
RealMoney Contributor

7/23/2008 1:00 PM EDT
Click here for more stories by Tom Graff
 
Try Jim Cramer's Action Alerts PLUS
CLICK HERE NOW

Sometimes life is unfair. Take, for example, Moody's Investor Service's ever changing criteria for their Aaa rating. On Monday, Moody's put both Assured Guaranty (AGO - commentary - Cramer's Take) and FSA's Aaa rating on negative watch. This despite Assured Guaranty having excess capital, defined as 1.3 times Moody's assumed losses given a "stress" scenario, and FSA falling short by only $140 million. Plus, FSA, it should be noted, just secured a $5 billion line of credit with parent Dexia.

 
In both cases, Moody's cited declining use of bond insurance in general: "Bond insurance volumes in the municipal segment have also declined significantly, with insurance penetration rates dropping by a third or more." It seems Moody's has concerns that the decline of muni insurance in general is a negative for FSA and Assured Guaranty's long-term business models. This is interesting, since FSA and Assured Guaranty have both increased their market share considerably. In Assured's case, they are writing substantially more business now than last year, and for FSA, it's at least close.

It still looks to me like FSA and Assured Guaranty have plenty of capital, especially given their lack of ABS CDO exposure. But it isn't my opinion that matters. So what should municipal investors do with their FSA and Assured Guaranty paper? And would a downgrade of either lead to an investment opportunity?

First, consider what "negative watch" means. In most cases, negative watch turns into a downgrade, unless some intervening event occurs. For FSA, it's possible that Dexia contributes capital to bring FSA above Moody's target levels. But given that Assured is already above those levels, it's not certain that a capital infusion would make any difference. So investors should assume that FSA and Assured Guaranty will be downgraded. I would also assume that S&P will eventually follow suit.

Go to NEXT PAGE


 RELATED STORIES

Bonds
Resist the Temptation of Mortgage-Backed Spreads
7/21/2008 1:59 PM EDT
The reality is that refis and housing turnover are slowing, making this area an ugly one to be in.

Bonds
What Recapitalization by Ambac and MBIA Means to Investors
7/10/2008 10:00 AM EDT
The plan in place means there's a chance, however small, that the two can put their troubles behind them.

Bonds
Ackman's Bet Against FSA Seems Off the Mark
6/24/2008 9:42 AM EDT
Shorting MBIA looks wise, but his new target appears healthier.



At the time of publication, Graff had no positions in the stocks mentioned, although positions may change at any time.

Tom Graff is a Managing Director of Cavanaugh Capital Management, a registered investment advisor in Baltimore Maryland. The opinions expressed here are Graff's own and in no way are the statements of Cavanaugh Capital Management, and may or may not reflect the strategies being pursued for clients of Cavanaugh Capital Management. Under no circumstances does the information in this column represent a recommendation to buy or sell stocks. Graff appreciates your feedback; click here to send him an email.



Brokerage Partners



Write us!
Order reprints of TSC articles.

Investor Relations | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Conflicts Policy | Corrections | Internet Index | Advertise | FAQ
Site Map | Who's Who | Reader Feedback | Employment | Contact Us
RSSSubscribe to our RSS Feed
© 1996- TheStreet.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
TheStreet.com's enterprise databases running Oracle are professionally monitored and managed by Pythian Remote DBA.