DOW
loading...
NASDAQ
loading...
S&P
loading...




Action Alerts PLUS
RealMoney Silver
Top Gun Trader
Stocks Under $10
Options Alerts
Top Stocks
View All


Now, enjoy the good life every day!

RSSRSS FEEDS
PODPODCASTS


RealMoney.com: The Turnaround Artist
Print This Story

Assigning Value to Brains and Brands

By Arne Alsin
RealMoney.com Contributor

12/2/2003 7:08 AM EST
 
 Valuation Analysis NEUTRAL
  • Don't value the Dow based on dividend yields.
  • Assess the underlying value of the business itself.
  • The Dow is more valuable now.

Of several hundred RealMoney columns I've written over the past few years, perhaps the one that generated the most email was on bond fund manager Bill Gross' call for Dow 5000. That piece brought in tons of passionate responses, many of which were longer than the column itself!



I saved one of those emails, written Sept. 12, 2002, by RealMoney reader J.L. It's interesting to review this note now, some 14 months later. While the Dow hasn't come close to 5000 in the past year, this email still has several points that are worthy of comment:

"Arne, I don't think the ultimate point in Bill Gross' Dow 5000 article was dividend yields, but valuation. The American stock market is still absurdly expensive."

I think that thesis is mistaken on both counts. Gross came up with a Dow 5000 target based on the dividend yield, a metric that has nothing to do with the valuation of a business. I put myself in the position of a control investor when I do my valuation work. That doesn't mean I value the company as if I owned 100% of the stock, but as if I owned sufficient shares to "control" the corporation. For example, Ralph Lauren owns more than 40% of the shares of Polo Ralph Lauren (RL - commentary - Cramer's Take). That's enough to put him in a control position. By the way, Lauren also owns almost all of the voting shares -- similar to Phil Knight of Nike (NKE - commentary - Cramer's Take).

Determining Value

To control investors, dividends are irrelevant to valuation. What does determine value then? It's all about earnings, cash flow (especially free cash flow) and net assets (net of all liabilities, including contingent and off balance sheet liabilities).

Whether a control investor decides to pay out all of the earnings in dividends or pay no dividends at all has nothing to do with the value of the business. So it is with using the dividend yield as a metric to value the Dow Jones Industrial Average: It's irrelevant. To say that, based on historical dividend-yield norms, the Dow would have to fall to 5000 tells me nothing about the earnings, cash flow and net assets of the 30 companies that make up the Dow average. Clearly, many significant companies with very valuable assets pay no dividend at all, such as Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A - commentary - Cramer's Take).

Go to NEXT PAGE



Arne Alsin is the founder and principal of Alsin Capital Management, an Oregon-based investment advisor and portfolio manager of The Turnaround Fund, a no-load mutual fund. Under no circumstances does the information in this column represent a recommendation to buy or sell stocks. At time of publication, Alsin and/or ACM had no positions in any of the securities mentioned, although holdings can change at any time. Alsin appreciates your feedback and invites you to send it to arne@alsincapital.com. Click here to receive Arne's latest favorite stock picks from his newsletter, TheStreet.com Value Investor.
Write us!
Order reprints of TSC articles. Top



Brokerage Partners


Investor Relations | Privacy Policy | Terms of Use | Conflicts Policy | Corrections | Internet Index | Advertise | FAQ
Site Map | Who's Who | Reader Feedback | Employment | Contact Us
RSSSubscribe to our RSS Feed
© 1996- TheStreet.com, Inc. All rights reserved.
TheStreet.com's enterprise databases running Oracle are professionally monitored and managed by Pythian Remote DBA.