![]() |
Before we delve into the matter further, let's stipulate that even the most egregious ramming of prices higher or lower by speculative traders provides a useful social service. Seriously -- how else can we discover at what price consumers will start changing their behavior or producers will either expand or contract capacity depending on the direction of the price? And in that light, as we shall see below, we seem to be getting near at least a short-term price rejection for crude oil.
How Convenient!While traders tend to focus on price for obvious reasons, the forward curve of any physical commodity provides a great deal of information on availability of supplies, demand for price insurance and overall anxiety about a trend's sustainability. The crude oil forward curve, which had been trading in backwardation -- or premium of the front-month futures to the deferred months -- started to shift into a carry structure after April 25. I discussed a similar shift and the reasons behind it in April 2005 and later again in March 2006.
If we map the convenience yields between July and succeeding months of crude oil after the current leg of the rally began on April 2, we see a steady decline from April 25 down to last Wednesday -- May 21 -- marked with the green line. This indicated much of the rally was being propelled not by just-in-time buyers of the front month, but rather by buyers in the deferred months.
This sort of increase in excess volatility often signals an imminent short-term trend reversal. Given the extended technical state of the crude oil market, that reversal could be quite violent, if only temporary. Those old enough to remember the October 1987 stock market crash may wish to use it as an analogy.
From Washington With LoveNow let's turn to the question of the day -- whether the federal government should reclassify long-only commodity index funds, all of whom are one-way buy-and-roll speculators as opposed to the old-fashioned buy-and-sell speculators who offset each other, as speculators for purposes of imposing position limits. The answer at first blush is, "Well, of course! Why should they drive prices higher by overwhelming the ability of natural shorts to sell against their position?" But we should ask ourselves which road is paved with good intentions and why the Law of Unintended Consequences never is violated.
The ICE's cumulative distribution catches up inside of three years, which suggests the contract is being used to price and hedge commodity index swaps. It cannot be used to facilitate physical commerce, as it is cash-settled.
If Congress or the CFTC moves to restrict the index funds, they will simply move their activities to ICE or to other non-U.S. exchanges outside of the U.S. reporting system. The net result will be even less transparency than we have today. This may be happening already. How else can we explain the combination of the absurdity of last week's Commitments of Traders report, the observed changes in crude oil's forward curve and the reversal of a long-standing relationship between excess volatility and the price trend? This is a movie I haven't seen yet, and it has my full and complete attention.
Go to REALMONEY.COM HOME PAGE | Go to BEGINNING OF STORY
Howard L. Simons is president of Simons Research, a strategist for Bianco Research, a trading consultant and the author of The Dynamic Option Selection System. Under no circumstances does the information in this column represent a recommendation to buy or sell securities. While Simons cannot provide investment advice or recommendations, he appreciates your feedback; click here to send him an email. Brokerage Partners
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||