|
TheStreet Mobile |
MainStreet |
StockPickr |
BankingMyWay |
Jim Cramer |
Doug Kass |
Don Dion's ETFs |
Try Action Alerts PLUS - FREE
Sorry that you couldn't find the page you wanted.Here are a couple of ways that can help you find that information successfully.Content Search: Quote Search: (Stocks, ETFs, Mutual Funds) TheStreet Directory
More From TheStreetLatest Headlines |
|
Commentary: The Teleconomist *New* Alerts! Please click here...
Yes, there's a glut of Cisco (CSCO:Nasdaq - news - commentary) products on the market. And undoubtedly, the collapse of so many competitive telecommunications companies will result in more inventory -- not just from Cisco, but from a lot of other telecom equipment vendors, too -- flooding the market.
Some areas of the network are experiencing more innovation and technological advancement than others, so I think it's important to expand upon the segmentation of the network that I started last week, explaining the difference between enterprise equipment and more robust "core" equipment. In a later column, I'll tackle the questions of which areas are being advanced and who's doing the advancing. If you work for a medium or large company, chances are that your company owns and maintains routers and switches that sit in your building. The equipment in your building is called customer premise equipment, or CPE, which is also known as enterprise equipment (indicated in red in the graphic). Because these switches and routers are purchased by your company's IT department and not by a carrier, demand for this equipment is not necessarily related to the state of the teleconomy.
From those routers and switches in your office building, your traffic flows over wires that are connected to a central office, or CO. A CO is a sort of major hub for all of the houses and offices near you. Inside the CO sits bigger and more robust routers and switches and a whole bunch of other equipment that enables you to access the public switched telephone network, or PSTN, the Internet or other networks. The wires and equipment that transport your traffic back and forth from your building to the CO are called access because it's here that you actually access the networks. (That's indicated in pink in the graphic.) These connections -- whether copper, coax or fiber -- are owned and maintained by a service provider, and, like the next two segments of the network, demand for anything access depends on the state of teleconomics. Where the Focus IsThis first hub aggregates a whole bunch of traffic from many different end-users in your area, and most of that traffic will probably need to be sent to a carrier hotel (another even more-major hub) that interconnects all the disparate metro and long-haul networks. The wires and the equipment that transport your traffic back and forth from these hubs are called the metro part of the network. (That's green in the graphic.) The connections among all of the COs and carrier hotels are owned and operated by telco service providers. Finally, if your call or data need to be sent out of the city, it'll go over one of the long-haul companies' networks. We've spent the past six or seven years blowing through billions upon billions of dollars laying hundreds of thousands of miles of long-haul fiber. I like to say that the long-haul network is now "gluttish." In other words, while there's not a true glut of capacity in the long-haul because demand still exists for long-haul services and transport, a lot of that demand gets stuffed up at the edge of the long-haul network, where the long-haul pipes terminate in a major city. Like the metro area, these intercity connections are owned and operated by telco service providers. Later today, I'll have a column that addresses the teleconomic conditions and the companies focusing on each segment of the network. ![]()
Cody Willard is a telecom and Internet infrastructure analyst and consultant. He is also founder of Teleconomist.com, a Web site devoted to news and analysis of telecommunications stocks. At time of publication, Willard had no position in any of the stocks mentioned in this article, although holdings can change at any time. Under no circumstances does the information in this column represent a recommendation to buy or sell stocks. Willard appreciates your feedback and invites you to send it to clwillard@teleconomist.com.
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
![]()
|
Content Search:
Quote Search:
(Stocks, ETFs, Mutual Funds)
TheStreet Directory
| Dow Jones | S&P 500 | NASDAQ | 10-Year Note | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 10,023.42 | 1,069.30 | 2,112.44 | 35.03 |
Oil *
76.05
|
|
UP
17.46
|
UP
2.67
|
UP
7.12
|
DOWN
0.30
|
10 Yr
3.50%
SPDR Gold
107.43
|
|
+0.17%
|
+0.25%
|
+0.34%
|
-0.85%
|
Data delayed 20 minutes |