Cramer: The Way Ahead Is Down

Sell everything. Nothing's working. Revisit when the prices are adjusted for a big recession, soaring inflation and a crushed consumer. Sell at 12,000 and come back at 10,000. Even better: short it.

Are you going to argue with any of that? Do you have a case against it? What's the counter? Takeovers? We've had a couple: Anheuser-Busch (BUD Quote), Wrigley (WWY Quote). Good if you owned them.

Lower rates? Can the Fed help? We assume the Fed is done. The odds favor higher rates. Bank turnarounds? How, with short-rates going up? With housing prices going down?

Can oil go down? Only with a worldwide crash, and with a worldwide crash, why would we come back at 10,000?

Can the consumer get more liquid? How? Unemployment's going higher. Wages won't go up in that environment.

That's the environment. It's pretty bulletproof when it comes to its logic.

In fact, there's really only one thing that could be wrong with it. EVERYONE AND HIS BROTHER BELIEVES IN IT. It is the most consensus of consensus views.

Sometimes the consensus is dead right: Housing's been going down and everyone knows it's going down, and it keeps going down.

I have said the same thing about Citigroup (C Quote) and Wachovia (WB Quote) and Washington Mutual (WM Quote) and Bank of America (BAC Quote) -- cut the dividend already! -- and GM (GM Quote) -- cut the dividend again already! -- and Ford (F Quote). That's been right. That's worked.

So you can't just say the consensus is wrong.

The negativity coming into today's session is as thick as I can recall nearing most short-term bottoms. The issue is there is not enough fear out there. Despite the consensus, which obviously creates a need for lower prices before it is worth buying, there isn't a big spike in the VIX, there isn't a gap down, or a crescendo of selling. There isn't even any volume. So while the bearishness is real thick, the selling isn't. (Bloomberg had an excellent piece on this yesterday, noting how much lower the VIX was than at other bottoms.)