The political fistfight over Social Security reform suddenly looks more like a carefully choreographed ballet.
Republicans and Democrats are eager to make it their own campaign issue -- so they're concentrating on their footwork to avoid embarrassing missteps. But in so doing, both parties have neglected to address any specifics in this year's midterm election. "The quality of debate today leaves much to be desired," said Henry Aaron, senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, a moderate think tank in Washington, D.C. Democrats say they won't touch Social Security, while Republicans generally advocate carving out part of the Social Security trust fund and allocating it to private accounts. Such a plan would allow individuals to invest in the public markets. Republicans say they'll do this without raising taxes, cutting benefits or expanding the deficit. "Since that's not possible, both sides are basically promising to do nothing," said Harry Zeeve, national field director of the Concord Coalition, a nonpartisan group focused on fiscal responsibility of social programs. "And that's a big problem." Think tanks agree that an issue as thorny as how to reform the country's retirement program needs bipartisan support. Even if Republicans sweep the House and Senate in the midterm election, they'll still need to find enough support among both parties to pass any initiative.![]() |
| Related Stories |
| Congress Braces for High-Stakes Vote |
| Wall Street No Longer Likes Congressional Gridlock |
| Democrats' Pocketbook Campaign Comes Up Empty |
| Wall Street Tries to Buy Lenience on Election Day |





