The Market Caught Its Breath; Now It's Time to Climb the Next Hill
12/06/00 - 02:09 PM EST
We've had a brutal time of it this year. The Nasdaq
, the go-go king of 1999 and early 2000, is ailing. Talk of recession looms heavy in the air, and the doom-and-gloomers have started barking "I told you so."
![]() |
| Yes. The Market Caught Its Breath; Now It's Time to Climb the Next Hill |
|
No. The Only Thing Left of This Bull Is What Comes Out the Back End |
. Chairman Greenspan
has gotten the comedown in stock prices he has lusted for ever since he began muttering about exuberance several years ago. The go-go Nasdaq-to-the-moon market flavor has withered. And signs of economic slowing are cropping up with greater frequency. On Tuesday, Greenspan hinted that maybe it's
time to change the tune at the Fed and start moving to a more accommodative stance. One of the major keys to the bull-market sprint of yesteryear was a friendly Fed. If Greenspan follows through and starts reducing interest rates (the low unemployment rate, still at 3.9%, is one thing that might stay his hand), then we have a return of the most important element of the bull case. It's an old saw, but it still seems to work: Don't fight the Fed. If the Fed is no longer in a fighting mood, there's cause for optimism. Second, energy prices. Yes, the New Economy was supposed to end the reliance on energy prices. And, in a large way, it did. The tripling of oil prices from the lows in less than two years has not slaughtered the economy, but oil above $30 and near $40 did a great deal to slow things down. Now we're seeing oil prices start to ease, with futures contracts indicating prices into the $20s next year. If oil prices are starting to behave, that's another bullish arrow in the quiver. Third, valuations. This is a trickier idea, but it returns us to one of the long-held beliefs of the Abby J. Cohen bull view. The Goldman Sachs strategist argues that the market moves in a step pattern, racing ahead and then holding as future earnings come into focus. We've been holding for a long time, waiting to take that next step higher. For some of us, holding has felt like falling, but the fact is stocks have not gained ground while corporate profits have continued to grow. Consider that the Nasdaq is right around where it was in July, 1999, just before it began its remarkable sprint to 5000. That development -- increasing earnings on stock prices that, effectively, haven't moved -- has brought stock valuations back from the stratosphere. Are stocks cheap? No, they are not yet cheap. But this bull market -- if we're talking about a return to some of the flavor of yesteryear -- rarely produced cheap moments. Even in 1994, during the last soft-landing pause, stocks never became historically cheap. But that pause, once completed, became a great buying chance for the next several years. Fourth, competitive positioning. The fact remains that American companies -- U.S. stocks -- stand at the head of most of the key sectors that are driving growth in the world economy. High technology remains a powerful growth engine, and many parts of the world are still playing catch-up, angling to get into the 21st century. That's good news for the continued growth of the important high-technology stocks. And that's a good thing for U.S. stocks. Fifth, cash. Lots of it is sitting on the sidelines. While the market has headed south, hard, since the spring, funds have accumulated cash positions. From 4.3% at the end of 1999, cash positions at funds have risen above 6%. Individuals have moved to the sidelines, building their own cash positions, and sentiment has become lousy. Sure, some people are still hanging on, hoping and praying. But much of the selling, I would argue, has already been done. When sentiment gets this lousy, the contrarian view is that nobody is left out there to do a lot of selling. That's usually what happens when we find a bottom. Sixth, politics. Yes, lots of concern about politics these days. But step back from the minute-by-minute courtroom drama and you still get what works for the stock market: a government that can mainly tweak around the edges. I hate the term gridlock, but the fact is that, in this environment, sweeping, intrusive moves by the government are unlikely, if not impossible. And the market, generally, favors incrementalism from Washington. Seventh, inflation. Not nearly as benign as yesteryear, prices remain well contained with the 




