Parametric Technology (PMTC) develops software used for product lifecycle management and enterprise content management. With a P/E of approximately 15 times and a 5.3% free cash flow yield, Parametric appears cheap relative to other technical software developers. However, its earnings quality has historically been low and it faces more severe competition than some of its peers. With earnings quality improving and the valuation favorable, Parametric certainly bears watching. But for now, Dassault Systemes (DASTY) and Ansys (ANSS) have sufficiently better prospects to justify their higher valuations. Compared to companies like Ansys, which develops highly technical products and has relatively few competitors, Parametric has significant competition in each of its business segments. PLM competitors include Dassault, Siemens (SI) subsidiary UGS, Autodesk (ADSK) and Agile Software. The company also competes with larger enterprise-solution companies such as SAP (SAP) that have entered the PLM market and offer solutions integrated with their other enterprise software applications. Competitors in the ECM space include EMC's (EMC) Documentum, IBM's (IBM) FileNet and OpenText (OTEX) . Parametric suffered mightily during the tech downturn, but the company has been engineering a turnaround since 2004 based on improved profitability and a return to growth. Current consensus growth estimates for the next five years are just 7%, or half the rate expected for the industry. The lower growth estimates are part of the reason for the cheaper valuation. However, they also make for a lower bar to clear, and the recent reversals of its deferred tax valuation allowance are a signal that the company is likely to earn sufficient income in future years to use tax losses from prior periods. There are a few other issues that cause me to believe Parametric's low valuation is justified. For example, 58% of revenues are derived in North America, which faces an uncertain near-term economic outlook. Another issue is earnings quality. Gross margins have been declining due to a higher percentage of revenue being derived from consulting and training rather than license and maintenance revenue. A bad-debt charge-off in 2006 and increased customer financing activity are other signals that earnings quality may be low. To get a feel for overall earnings quality, I calculated the accrual ratio, or the change in net operating assets divided by average net operating assets. This ratio describes the percentage of earnings contributed by discretionary accounting items rather than actual cash flows. An ideal accrual ratio would fluctuate around zero. Parametric's has been all over the map, though it has been improving for several quarters.
JAVA Brews Up Weak Revenue, Strong Earnings Tech's Too Hot? Says Who? Sirius Looks to Move Higher on Merger OK
At the time of publication, Trent was long nakes put options on Ansys, although positions may change at any time.William A. Trent, CFA, is a freelance equity analyst based in the New York metro area. He has been an equity analyst since 1996 and is co-author of Understanding and Evaluating Prospectuses, Offering Documents, and Proxy Statements. Under no circumstances does the information in this column represent a recommendation to buy or sell stocks. Trent appreciates your feedback; click here to send him an email.
Read our conflicts and disclosure policy. |
|
Terms of Use | Privacy Policy
© 1996- TheStreet.com, Inc. All rights reserved. |