As much as I love and respect my friend Jim Cramer, I have to disagree with his view that ethanol is a fad. I agree some companies are overvalued, but I dont believe that ethanol itself is a fad.
Jim is right, as he normally is, about solar. Solar is a renewable energy whose cost will actually increase in the next couple of years due to capacity constraints in polysilicon. Solar is not and will not, at least for the foreseeable future, be an economical alternative (without huge subsidies) to other sources of energy. But ethanol is not a fad. Ethanol is not a dot-com. I believe the trend is real; the only question is which horse to ride. Ethanol is not our answer to oil independence, but for those who say the Saudis are happy about ethanol, I suggest you have a doctor check you for a malignant case of ignorance. Corn-based ethanol can be produced for about $1.10 a gallon, while gasoline is produced for about $1.69 a gallon. Corn would have to go to $4 a bushel and oil below $50 a barrel to reverse this, something that is unlikely. The numbers for cellulosic ethanol are going to be even better -- refer to the article I wrote about Xethanol



